This article criticizes the recent amendment to Rule 93(2) of the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961, which restricts public access to election-related records.
Key arguments:
Undermines transparency: The amendment limits public access to crucial election records, such as Form 17C and CCTV footage, hindering transparency and accountability in the electoral process.
Contradicts the spirit of free and fair elections: The amendment contradicts the fundamental principles of free and fair elections, which require transparency and public scrutiny.
Concerns over ECI's reluctance to share information: The ECI has shown reluctance to share crucial election data, such as Form 17C, with the public, raising concerns about its commitment to transparency and accountability.
Potential for misuse: The amendment could be misused to conceal irregularities and manipulate election results.
Importance of public trust: Transparency and public access to information are crucial for maintaining public trust in the electoral process.
Recommendations:
Withdraw the amendment: The government should withdraw the amendment to Rule 93(2) to ensure transparency and public access to election-related records.
Enhance transparency: The ECI should proactively disclose election data, including Form 17C, to enhance public trust and accountability.
Strengthen safeguards: Measures should be taken to strengthen the independence and impartiality of the ECI to ensure the integrity of the electoral process.
Overall:
The article argues that the amendment to Rule 93(2) is a step in the wrong direction and undermines the principles of transparency and accountability in the electoral process.
It emphasizes the need for greater transparency and public access to election-related information to ensure the integrity and fairness of elections in India.
COMMENTS