Justice Yadav's Speech and Its Impact
Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav's speech at the Allahabad High Court challenged the Constitution’s principles, including secularism and justice.
His remarks, seen as promoting impunity and inciting violence, have shocked citizens and political leaders, leading to impeachment motions and calls for action.
The speech is seen as a public humiliation and a violation of the constitutional values that bind India together.
Threat to Constitutional Integrity
Yadav's words threaten the unity and integrity of India by undermining the values of equality, justice, and fraternity.
The lack of immediate condemnation from the High Court raises concerns about judicial accountability.
The speech calls for a collective response from citizens, elected officials, and the judiciary to reaffirm India’s constitutional commitment.
The Constitution as a Shared Resource
The Constitution should be seen as a "commons," meaning it belongs to all citizens and not just the judiciary.
Its interpretation must be rooted in the evolving present and future of India, not solely in past judicial precedents.
Civil disobedience and resistance, inspired by historical figures like Gandhi and Ambedkar, are necessary to preserve constitutional values when they are under attack.
Proposed Response and Action
Impeachment alone is insufficient, as political influence may prevent its success.
Public and judicial action, rooted in the spirit of civil disobedience, is necessary to challenge the breach of judicial propriety.
The Constitution's "We" is a pluralistic, non-denominational people, not defined by any one religion or group, and must remain protected from harmful rhetoric.
COMMENTS