While political affiliations don’t usually disqualify someone from holding judicial office, open bigotry does.
Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav’s controversial remarks raise concerns about his impartiality as a judge.
At a Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) event, Justice Yadav made a statement suggesting that India should be run according to the wishes of the Hindu majority.
He also criticized Muslims, claiming they lack kindness and tolerance. These comments were seen as divisive and inappropriate for a judge.
Justice Yadav has previously made inflammatory remarks, such as about cows and religious conversions, which further question his impartiality.
The Supreme Court has taken notice of his remarks and asked for details from the Allahabad High Court, signaling that the judge’s conduct will be reviewed.
The VHP, known for promoting Hindu majoritarian views and being associated with violent movements, was not an appropriate platform for a judge to engage with.
Judges are expected to avoid such biased forums.
The 1997 "Restatement of Values of Judicial Life" emphasizes that judges must maintain impartiality to preserve public trust.
Justice Yadav’s actions represent a serious breach of these ethical guidelines
COMMENTS