Political parties use cash transfers to retain support, with schemes like Maharashtra’s Ladki Bahin and Madhya Pradesh’s Ladli Behna being examples of success in elections.
These schemes, such as Delhi’s Mukhyamantri Mahila Samman Yojana, provide cash to women, helping them gain financial independence and dignity, especially in patriarchal societies.
Cash transfers compensate for unpaid women’s work in the household and offer financial flexibility for essentials or savings.
These schemes are popular in states where they are implemented due to the financial independence they offer women.
They are not substitutes for comprehensive welfare programs, which should focus on creating jobs and supporting sustainable economic growth.
States like Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh face stagnation in employment, despite cash transfers, highlighting the need for policies that create jobs and diversify economies.
Populist cash schemes are seen as short-term fixes, while long-term policies focusing on employment and economic growth are necessary.
AAP, initially focused on health and education, now mirrors populist schemes of cash transfers, signaling a lack of new ideas for Delhi's future.
COMMENTS