The Supreme Court affirmed that accessibility is a fundamental human right for people with disabilities.
This right is often overlooked and not adequately realized on the ground.
The court highlighted the significant gap in accessibility in public spaces, particularly in transportation and infrastructure.
While some newer facilities meet accessibility standards, older ones often lack basic features like accessible restrooms.
The judgment emphasized the often-neglected emotional and relational needs of people with disabilities.
The court called for greater recognition and support for these needs.
The court criticized the non-mandatory nature of certain accessibility standards in the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Rules.
This has led to poor compliance and inadequate accessibility on the ground.
The court directed the government to issue new Rules with mandatory accessibility standards within three months.
The judgment stressed the need for universal design, which considers the needs of all users, including people with disabilities.
Accessibility should be integrated into the design process from the beginning, rather than as an afterthought.
The court advocated for the "social model of disability," which focuses on removing societal barriers rather than "fixing" individuals.
By emphasizing the importance of accessibility and universal design, the Supreme Court's judgment has significant implications for policymakers, urban planners, and businesses.
It calls for a more inclusive and equitable society where people with disabilities can fully participate and contribute.
COMMENTS