Escalation of Violence in Manipur
There has been a significant increase in violence in Manipur, leading the Chief Minister to demand more control over security operations.
Reports indicate a breakdown of constitutional order, raising concerns about the government's ability to manage the situation.
There are discussions about invoking Article 355, which mandates the Union to protect states against internal disturbances.
Special Provisions in the Constitution
The Indian Constitution includes special provisions for various states to manage their unique identities and promote equitable development.
Manipur is governed by Article 371C which provides for the creation of a Hill Area Committee consisting of elected representatives from such areas
Article 371F: This article grants special rights to Sikkim and allows Parliament to protect the rights of different populations.
Supreme Court’s Observations
R.C. Poudyal Case: The Court upheld special provisions for the Bhutia-Lepcha community in Sikkim, emphasizing historical context and the need for power-sharing to ensure political stability
Tripura Accord: The Court validated the disproportionate representation of tribal populations in Tripura, citing it as necessary for peace and stability.
Article 332(3B) was inserted in 1992 to give “greater share” in governance
The Court recognized the Constitution's capacity to adapt to diverse and complex societal needs.
Way Forward
To address tensions in Manipur, it's essential to ensure fair representation and resource allocation among communities.
Strengthening the Hill Area Committee's role and ensuring its involvement in governance could help alleviate concerns.
Encouraging open discussions among communities and stakeholders is crucial for fostering peace and reconciliation.
Continued evolution of constitutional provisions to accommodate the diverse needs of society is necessary for long-term stability.
COMMENTS