Previous ruling: A 2004 Supreme Court judgment prohibited states from sub-classifying Scheduled Castes (SCs) for the purpose of granting quotas within the overall SC quota.
Several states challenged this decision, arguing for the need to address disparities within the SC community.
The Supreme Court's new Decision
A seven-judge bench overruled the 2004 judgment, allowing states to sub-classify SCs.
The court recognized the heterogeneity within the SC community and the need to address the specific needs of its most marginalized groups.
Sub-classification must be based on clear criteria, have a rational basis, and be subject to judicial review.
The ruling is expected to empower states to implement targeted measures for the most disadvantaged sections of the SC community.
Creamy Layer Exclusion
The court raised the possibility of excluding more affluent members of SC communities from the benefits of affirmative action.
The issue of creamy layer for SCs was not definitively resolved in this judgment.
Overall Implications
The ruling is a significant step towards addressing disparities within the SC community.
It provides states with greater flexibility in designing targeted affirmative action programs.
The potential implementation of a creamy layer mechanism for SCs is a complex issue that requires further consideration.
COMMENTS