Of all the Lok Sabhas with completed terms, the 17th Lok Sabha witnessed several regrettable firsts.
It was the first to not appoint a Deputy Speaker.
It recorded the lowest number of sittings.
It passed significant legislation such as criminal reform Bills when more than 70% of the Opposition MPs were suspended.
The Prime Minister did not answer any questions orally and only one in writing.
While these developments mark a new low in parliamentary functioning.
This is not an anomaly; rather, it is a trend that has continued for more than 30 years.
The annual average of Bills passed declined from 65 in the 1952-1990 period to 48 in 1991-2023.
The number of Bills sent to committees for scrutiny also dwindled consistently,
With the 17th Lok Sabha sending only 16% of Bills for scrutiny, the lowest in the past four Lok Sabhas.
The declining number of sitting days and hours in the Lok Sabha limits the scope for debates and diminishes MPs’ participation.
Prior to 1990, each Lok Sabha typically convened for over 550 days on average, spanning 3,500 hours.
However, post-1990, an average Lok Sabha only meets for 345 days, spanning less than 1,800 hours.
The 17th Lok Sabha had the least number of sittings , 274.
Parliamentary tools allow MPs to ensure executive accountability and remediate potential issues for their constituents.
A half-hour discussion enables MPs to deliberate on responses to parliamentary questions.
Before the 1990s, there were 88 such discussions per Lok Sabha.
Post-1990, there were only 11 half-hour discussions per Lok Sabha.
The 17th Lok Sabha permitted only one such discussion, marking an all-time low.
Short duration discussions, permitting members to initiate discussions on matters of public importance, were prevalent before 1990, averaging 46 per Lok Sabha.
Post-1990, this number diminished to 39.
The adjournment motion, employed to address urgent issues with a subsequent vote, serves as an expression of disagreement with the government’s policies.
Pre-1990, the Lok Sabha permitted discussion and voting on four such motions on average.
Post-1990, this number decreased to three.
The 16th and 17th Lok Sabha allowed no adjournment motions.
Scholars and experts identified this trend early on, with a notable instance being a 2000 paper authored by Dr. Subhash C Kashyap, the former Secretary-General of Lok Sabha.
COMMENTS